Wararat Jaichuen, DDS, MPH1*, Warangkana Vejvithee, DDS, MSc2
1Health Administration Division, Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Rd., Talat Khwan, Muang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi 11000 Thailand.
2Bureau of Dental Health, Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Rd., Talat Khwan, Muang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi 11000 Thailand.
*Corresponding Author: Wararat Jaichuen, DDS, MPH, Health Administration Division, Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Rd., Talat Khwan, Muang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi 11000 Thailand.
Abstract
Objective
To compare the oral health-related behaviors and oral health status among the elders who lived in the area with the oral health-promoting elderly club and another area without a club
Methods
Samples from areas with and without oral health-promoting elderly clubs were compared. A structural questionnaire was used to collect demographic characteristics, oral health-related behaviors, and oral health outcomes. Descriptive statistics and the chi-square test were utilized.
Results
695 from 700 respondents’ data were completed. Six oral health-related behaviors, which are brushing teeth after lunch, brushing teeth at night, using dental floss, using proxabrush, never smoking or quitting smoking, and consulting dental personnel when having oral health symptoms, presented a significantly higher proportion among the group from areas with oral health-promoting elderly clubs. Having at least four pairs of occlusal teeth was the only outcome that was significantly different between the groups.
Conclusions
Oral health-promoting elderly clubs were associated with six behaviors and outcomes. By the way, smoking behavior needs more addressed. The oral health-related quality of life should be included as an indicator of oral health systems. And the new approach is needed for promoting oral health among Thai elderly men.
Keywords: elder, elderly club, oral health promotion, oral health-related behavior, oral health-related quality of life, oral health outcome
Introduction
Health promotion has been the key objective of health system reform since the campaign “Health for all” was announced [18]. The central government of Thailand also adopted health promotion as the main strategy of health system development [11]. All health-related subsystems, including oral health, followed this directive.
Oral health status among Thais has steadily improved [3], however aging society is the big issue of the country at present. The National Oral Health Plan for Senior Citizens was launched for coping with this challenge which is composed of two main strategies: promotion of oral health self-care and improving the oral health of the elderly [2]. For implementing those strategies, the elderly clubs have been used as target settings, and become known as “Oral health-promoting elderly clubs” since 2006. The number of the clubs has gradually expanded from seven in the first year to more than 8,000 that now cater for around two million Thai elders [4]. Various oral health promotion activities are run by the clubs independently without central guidelines. The only key message relayed to oral health practitioners concerned the ultimate goal of the plan as maintaining twenty teeth and four pairs of occlusal teeth [2]. However, the effectiveness of these clubs has never been quantified and evaluated. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the outcomes of the oral health-promoting elderly clubs in Thailand by comparing the oral health-related behaviors and oral health status among the elders who lived in the area with the club and another area without the club.
Methods
This cross-sectional study used a mixed methodology. Twelve provinces from four regions of Thailand were selected as study settings. Inclusion criteria included provinces having at least one area with the oral health-promoting elderly club and another area without a club.
Participants were randomly selected from elders in the study settings. Inclusion criteria were independent elders who had lived in the study setting for at least five years and were willing to participate but excluded those who needed a translator for communication. The sample size was 350 per group, and a total of 700 elders participated in this study.
A structured questionnaire was used for collecting data. The interviewers were trained in a one-day workshop by the researcher. The questionnaire consisted of three parts as 1) General characteristics, 2) Oral health-related behaviors, and 3) Oral health outcomes. Questions on oral health-related behaviors were adapted from four functions of self-care described by Barofsky. These included regulatory self-care to regulate bodily processes, preventive self-care to prevent disease, reactive self-care to alleviate symptoms that have not yet been identified, and restorative self-care as a prescribed treatment regimen [1]. Questions on oral health outcomes directly assessed the ultimate goal of the national oral health plan in terms of the total number of remaining teeth and pairs of occlusal teeth. The outcome of oral health-related quality of life was assessed by the Thai version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (Thai-OHIP) [11]. Data collection was conducted between July and September 2019. Descriptive statistics and the chi-square test were used to compare outcomes between elders from areas with and without oral health-promoting elderly clubs.
Ethical approval was obtained from the ethical committee on human rights related to research involving human subjects at the Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand. Approval was given to undertake the research, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Results
Data were collected from all 700 participants, but five questionnaires were incomplete. This left 695 for analysis (99.3 %). Completed data gave 617 participants who had at least one tooth remaining in their mouths, while 150 wore dentures of both professional and non-professional types. General characteristics of the elders were similar between settings. Education was the only different characteristic between the groups, participants in an area with the club had a higher educational level (Table 1).
Table 1: Demographic characteristics of the participants
Percentage of elderly people |
|||
Demographic characteristic |
with an oral health promoting elderly club |
without an oral health promoting elderly club |
Total (n = 695) |
Sex |
|
|
|
Male |
31.4 |
35.9 |
33.7 |
Female |
68.6 |
64.1 |
66.3 |
Age group |
|
|
|
60-64 years |
28.0 |
30.7 |
29.4 |
65-69 years |
33.4 |
25.3 |
29.4 |
70-74 years |
19.9 |
22.7 |
21.3 |
75-79 years |
12.1 |
15.2 |
13.7 |
80+ years |
6.6 |
6.0 |
6.3 |
Education |
** |
|
|
Lower than primary school |
7.2 |
13.5 |
10.4 |
Primary school |
69.7 |
69.8 |
69.8 |
Secondary school/vocational certificate |
17.3 |
10.6 |
14.0 |
Higher than secondary school/vocational certificate |
5.8 |
6.0 |
5.9 |
Marital status |
|
|
|
Couple |
68.0 |
67.2 |
67.6 |
Single |
6.3 |
5.5 |
5.9 |
Divorced/Widowed/Separated |
25.7 |
27.3 |
26.5 |
Health status |
|
|
|
Normal |
49.0 |
44.0 |
46.5 |
Having at least one medical problem |
51.0 |
56.0 |
53.5 |
Income |
|
|
|
Have sufficient income |
67.7 |
61.8 |
64.7 |
Do not have enough income |
32.3 |
38.2 |
35.3 |
Health insurance |
|
|
|
Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS) |
80.1 |
83.0 |
81.6 |
Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme (CSMBS) |
19.0 |
15.2 |
17.1 |
Other |
0.9 |
1.7 |
1.3 |
**P<0.01: chi-square test |
|
|
|
Six oral health-related behaviors were found to be significantly different between the two groups. These included brushing teeth after lunch, brushing teeth at night, using dental floss, using a proxabrush, never smoking or quitting smoking, and consulting dental personnel when having oral health symptoms. All these behaviors were found at higher proportions in the group with access to the oral health-promoting elderly club. Three of these six behaviors as brushing teeth after lunch, using dental floss, and using a proxabrush were recorded in a small proportion of participants (Table 2).
Table 2: Oral health-related behaviors of elderly people with and without oral health promoting elderly clubs
Percentage of elderly people |
|||
Oral health-related behavior |
with an oral health promoting elderly club |
without an oral health promoting elderly club |
|
Regulatory self-care |
|
|
|
Usually brush teeth in the morninga |
95.1 |
|
95.8 |
Usually brush teeth after luncha |
18.0 |
* |
10.9 |
Usually brush teeth at nighta |
83.7 |
* |
75.2 |
Usually eat nothing after brushing teeth at nighta |
81.0 |
|
85.2 |
If wearing dentures, usually remove and clean them after eatingb |
78.8 |
|
80.0 |
Sometimes use dental flossa |
16. |
* |
10.6 |
Sometimes use a proxabrusha |
26.5 |
*** |
14.1 |
Sometimes use a toothpicka |
63.7 |
|
66.9 |
Sometimes use mouth rinsec |
32.6 |
|
39.4 |
Preventive self-care |
|
|
|
Sometimes perform oral health self-examinationc |
71.2 |
|
64.4 |
Never smoked/quit smokingc |
91.1 |
* |
85.1 |
Never chewed/quit chewing betel nutsc |
85.6 |
|
87.9 |
Rarely eat sugary snacks and drinksc |
23.9 |
|
21.8 |
Reactive self-care |
|
|
|
Usually use on the counter drugs to relieve oral health symptomsc |
36.3 |
|
29.6 |
Usually consult dental personnel when having oral health symptomsc |
78.7 |
** |
69.3 |
Usually consult dental personnel when having severe oral health symptomsc |
69.5 |
|
70.1 |
Restorative self-care |
|
|
|
Checkup oral health once a yearc |
86.7 |
|
81.6 |
Have full mouth scaling and polishing once a yeara |
64.1 |
|
61.1 |
Strictly follow dentist's instructions after treatmentc |
87.6 |
82.8 |
|
a n = 617: participants who had at least one tooth remaining in their mouth |
|
|
|
b n = 150: participants who wear both professional and non-professional denture types |
|
|
|
c n = 695: all participants |
|
|
|
*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001: chi-square test |
|
|
|
The oral health outcome in terms of ‘having at least four pairs of occlusal teeth’ was significantly different between the two participating groups, while indicators of the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) as overall oral health and prevalence of OHRQoL as assessed by the Thai-OHIP were found to be similar (Table 3).
Table 3. Oral health outcomes of elderly people with and without oral health promoting elderly clubs
Percentage of elderly people |
||
Oral health outcome |
with an oral health promoting elderly club |
without an oral health promoting elderly club |
Oral health status |
|
|
Have at least twenty teeth remaining in their mouth |
61.7 |
54.6 |
Having at least four pairs of occlusal teeth |
69.2 * |
60.6 |
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) |
|
|
Overall oral health satisfied |
87.6 |
88.2 |
Prevalence of OHRQoL assessed by the Thai-OHIP |
54.8 |
53.2 |
*P<0.05: chi-square test |
|
|
Discussion
The strategy of oral health promotion through elderly clubs has been driven for the past 13 years and coverage is still expanding. Previous studies found positive outcomes of oral health-promoting elderly clubs [7,17] but a comprehensive evaluation at the country level has never been conducted. The objective of this study was to explore the outcomes of the oral health-promoting elderly clubs in Thailand. A comparison of oral health-related behaviors and oral health outcomes was made between elders from areas with and without oral health promotion clubs.
Nineteen questions that assessed oral health-related behaviors were classified into four categories as 1) Regulatory self-care, 2) Preventive self-care, 3) Reactive self-care, and 4) Restorative self- care. Six out of 19 behaviors showed a significant relationship with the existence of oral health-promoting elderly clubs. Of these, four behaviors were classified into the regulatory self-care group and included brushing teeth after lunch, brushing teeth at night, using dental floss, and using a proxabrush, while two behaviors were classified into the preventive self-care and reactive self-care groups as never smoked/quit smoking and consulting dental personnel when having oral health symptom, respectively. Superior behavior characteristics were related to the existence of clubs but some findings might be overclaimed by oral health-promoting elderly clubs. This might occur because these outcomes are the objectives of the National Oral Health Plan for Senior Citizens that consists of various strategies [2], while the cross-sectional study design confirmed only the relationship between the variables.
Findings of oral health-related behaviors from this study were better than the latest national oral health survey of Thailand in terms of eating nothing after brushing teeth at night, removing and cleaning dentures after eating, using supplementary oral health care, whether as dental floss, a proxabrush, a toothpick or mouth rinse and oral health self-examination [3]. These improvements might reflect enhanced oral health service delivery that is another strategy in the national plan [2], since better access to care leads to direct communication with oral health practitioners who can then perform personal oral health promotion at the chairside [9,10]. By contrast, smoking behavior did not show improved results while this is a common risk factor shared with other non-communicable diseases [13] (Figure 1). This is a big challenge for personnel responsible for oral health care because the ultimate goal of the system is to promote oral h e a l t h s e l f -care f o r elders to maintain good oral health. Therefore, all oral health-related behaviors must be considered, not only cleaning behaviors.
‘Having at least twenty teeth with at least four pairs of occlusal teeth’ is the expected outcome, however, in this study, the presence of four pairs of occlusal teeth included participants wearing dentures. Therefore, the significant association between this outcome and implementation of oral health-promoting elderly clubs might be confounded by access to oral health services.
While no relationship of the OHRQoL was found with the implementation of oral health-promoting elderly clubs, but this issue should not be overlooked. As the FDI’s recommendation that the key performance indicators for assessment of oral health care needs and cost-effectiveness, as well as planning oral health services and setting policies, should be included in the OHRQoL together with clinical and behavioral indicators [8].
The main limitation of this study was the cross-sectional design. This constricted the analysis to explore only the relationships between the included variables. Causes and effects as the major objective of the evaluation were not considered. Further research is recommended using these results as baseline data. Another limitation resulted from the process of data collection. Sampling selection for elders who joined activities at the health center excluded males who commonly went to work during the daytime [14]. Thus, the majority of elders in the study were female at a higher proportion than the national statistics average [6]. This situation implied that any activities during the daytime at oral health-promoting elderly clubs were attended mainly by female elders. This led to the third issue of selecting health promotion activities that were compatible with the daily life cycles of males. Men commonly have more oral health issues than women. The lower number of functional teeth among males affects their chewing ability and nutritional status [12,15,16]. Males are more prone to the deleterious effects of smoking cigarettes that adversely impact dental hygiene.
In conclusion, the findings present significant associations between existing oral health-promoting elderly clubs and some oral health- related behaviors and oral health outcomes among the elders. Furthermore, three suggestions are proposed for the benefit of Thai oral health system planners: 1) smoking behavior should be addressed as a major deleterious factor for both oral hygiene and physical health,
2) OHRQoL should be included as an indicator to better monitor and evaluate the performance of oral health systems, and 3) a new approach should be adopted for oral health promotion by targeting elderly men.
Conflict of interest
The main author was a staff of the Bureau of Dental Health at the period of this study and has received a research grant from the Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.
Funding: This work was supported by the Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank all elders who participated in this study. Special thanks go to the oral health practitioners, who are representatives from Lamphun, Lampang, Nakhon Ratchasima, Mukdahan, Roi Et, Ubon Ratchathani, Umnad Chareun, Suphan Buri, Sa Kaew, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Song Khla, and Surat Thani province, for all of their help.
References
- Barofsky I (1978) Compliance, adherence and the therapeutic alliance: Steps in the development of self-care. Social Science & Medicine. Part A: Medical Psychology & Medical Sociology. 12(5A): 369-376.
- Bureau of Dental Health. (2014) National Oral Health Plan for Senior Citizens, Thailand. In: Department of Health (ed).
- Bureau of Dental Health. (2018) Report on the Eighth National Oral Health Survey of Thailand (2017). Nonthaburi: Ministry of Public Health.
- Bureau of Dental Health. (2020) Summary of the oral health promoting elderly club.
- Chaiphotchanaphong N, Tumrasvin W and Krisdapong S. (2011) Thai version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (Thai-OHIP).
- Department of Provincial Administration. (2019) Official statistics registration systems.
- Dumrong T (2013) Oral Health Promotion in Senior Clubs in the Eastern Part of Thailand. Thai Dental Public Health Journal 18(1): 49-63.
- FDI World Dental Federation. (2015) Oral Health and Quality of Life. FDI General Assembly.
- Kay E, Locker D (1998) A systematic review of the effectiveness of health promotion aimed at improving oral health. Community Dent Health 15(3): 132-144.
- McMillan W (2011) Making the most of teaching at the chairside. European Journal of Dental Education. 15(1): 63-68.
- Pectcharath K (2013) Statute on the National Health System B.E. 2552 (2009) Towards the well-being of Thai people.
- Samnieng P, Ueno M, Shinada K, Zaitsu T, Wright FAC, et al. (2011) Oral Health Status and Chewing Ability is Related to Mini-Nutritional Assessment Results in an Older Adult Population in Thailand. Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics. 30(3): 291-304.
- Sheiham A, Watt RG (2000) The Common Risk Factor Approach: a rational basis for promoting oral health. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 28(6): 399-406.
- Social Statistics Division. (2018) Summary of key findings in the working situation among Thai elders (2018). Bangkok: National Statistical Office.
- Srisilapanan P, Malikaew P, Sheiham A (2002) Number of teeth and nutritional status in Thai older people. Community Dent Health. 19(4): 230-236.
- Torrungruang K, Tamsailom S, Rojanasomsith K, Sutdhibhisal S, Nisapakultorn K, et al. (2005) Risk Indicators of Periodontal Disease in Older Thai Adults. Journal of Periodontology. 76(4): 558-565.
- Wasin T (2012) Evaluation of Oral Health Promotion in Elderly Club in Krabi Province, 2010. Thai Dental Public Health Journal. 17(2): 82-96.
- World Health Organization. (1986) The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.